KY121 said:LOL,
Do you finally admit to not playing your system in real play????
AlexD30 said:however the research also reveals that Walter's progression has a positive expectation and it make money over the long run. If you bet more while winning and bet minimum while losing you will be ahead.
Best Regards,
KY121 said:yeah alex, i am the one who figured that out by actually losing $1100 REMEMBER????
grooven said:[quote=AlexD30]however the research also reveals that Walter's progression has a positive expectation and it make money over the long run. If you bet more while winning and bet minimum while losing you will be ahead.
Best Regards,
AlexD30 said:[quote=grooven][quote=AlexD30]however the research also reveals that Walter's progression has a positive expectation and it make money over the long run. If you bet more while winning and bet minimum while losing you will be ahead.
Best Regards,
Ray said:Alex-Being coy don't help the situation. Your concept is unique because,
like you say, it goes to the heart of the matter; win/loss ratio. ROR is
the big problem here and the frequency/probability of this occurance is
question #1. If you could arrive at some freq/prob, then you might have
some insight to the risk involved. I don't see anything in your post nor
in my investigations that offers any hope whatever. Normally, I would
reject any money management system, but the unique nature of your
concept is the only justification that I can offer for my ignorance.
Show me a resonable ROR avoidance and you will have my complete
support.
Ray
KY121 said:The FACT still stands: YOU HAVE LIED CONTINUALLY
now you are admitting to have had $500+ holes. which would mean a $165 bet at your 33% which you claimed to use all the time.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!